Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Newson v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 23-3942
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAFEAL DESHAWN NEWSON and Marquis Lee Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, GAYLE COCHRAN, Maricopa County Attorney, CINDY J. WINTERS, Maricopa County Attorney and others
Pfizer Inc. v. Li et al
as 3:2021cv01980
Plaintiff:
Pfizer Inc.
Defendant:
Chun Xiao Li and DOES 1-5
Seeley v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 3:2021cv07892
Plaintiff:
Debra Seeley
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Jacobson v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 2:2021cv07961
Plaintiff:
James Jacobson
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Molina Healthcare, Inc. v. Actavis Elizabeth, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv08438
Defendant:
Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., Camber Pharmaceutical, Inc., Emcure Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Molina Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Bingham County v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv00294
Defendant:
Auburn Pharmaceutical, McKesson Corporation, Thrifty Payless, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bingham County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re Ex Parte Application of Pfizer Canada ULC
as 2:2019mc00061
Interested Party:
Amgen Inc. and Amgen Canada Inc.
Petitioner:
Pfizer Canada ULC
In Re:
Ex Parte Application of Pfizer Canada ULC
Dake v. Colgate-Palmolive Company, et al
as 3:2019cv02319
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Dake
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., Thrifty Drugs Corporation, Thrifty Payless Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Dana Carrera vs Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 1:2019cv00536
Defendant:
DAP Products, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC. and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Carrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Kristin Haight v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00884
Defendant:
Accord Healthcare, Inc., Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kristin Hight
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
