Cases 1 - 8 of 8
David Goad v. Ronaldo Reyes, et al
as 22-55194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID GOAD
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALDO R. REYES, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee for Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2007-BR4, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Serices 2007-BR4, NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE, its successors and assigns and others
David Goad v. Ronaldo R. Reyes et al
as 8:2021cv01408
Plaintiff:
David Goad
Defendant:
Ronaldo R. Reyes, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, New Century Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
USA v. Cristobal Reyes-Rodriguez
as 19-10422
Defendant / Appellant:
CRISTOBAL REYES-RODRIGUEZ, AKA Christobal R/Reyes, AKA Christobal R. Reyes, AKA Cristobal Reyes Rodriguez, AKA Christabal Rodriguez, AKA Cristobal Rodriguez Reyes
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Karriem Shaheed v. R. Reyes, et al
as 19-15692
Defendant / Appellee:
J. DOUGERY, RON DAVIS, S. ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KARRIEM B. SHAHEED
R. Abcarian, et al v. Meldon Levine, et al
as 19-55129
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. ABCARIAN, R. REYES and H. REYES
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSE HUIZAR, MELDON EDISES LEVINE, MICHAEL NELSON FEUER and others
R. Abcarian, et al v. Meldon Levine, et al
as 16-56765
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. ABCARIAN, R. REYES and H. REYES
Defendant - Appellee:
MELDON EDISES LEVINE, WILLIAM WATSON FUNDERBURK, Jr., JILL BANKS BARAD and others
R. Abcarian et al v. Meldon Edises Levine et al
as 2:2016cv07106
Defendant:
Meldon Edises Levine, Paul Krekorian, Bob Blumenfield and others
Plaintiff:
R. Abcarian, H. Reyes, J. Petrie and others
Interested Party:
Justin Kristopher Le-Roy, Brendan Eisan, Tyler Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Marlon Reyes-Rico v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-73984
Petitioner:
MARLON R. REYES-RICO, AKA Marlon Raphael Rico Reyes
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
