Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 631
Curtis F. Robinson M.D. Inc. v. MultiPlan, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02993
Plaintiff: Curtis F. Robinson, M.D., Inc. on behalf of itself and others similarly situated doing business as Panoramic Medicine
Defendant: MultiPlan, Inc., Aetna, Inc., The Cigna Group and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
BC Dental, Inc., et al. v. Robinson Helicopter Company, et al.
as 24-2892
Plaintiff: BC DENTAL, INC., an Indiana corporation and STARR INDEMNITY AND LIABILITY COMPANY
Defendant: ROBINSON HELICOPTER COMPANY, a California Corporation, HBD INDUSTRIES, INC., an Ohio corporation and HBD/THERMOID, INC., an Ohio Corporation
Robinson v. TCP Global Corporation
as 2:2024cv00853
Plaintiff: Lavell C Robinson
Defendant: TCP Global Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Welch v. Hicks, et al.
as 24-2633
Plaintiff: KENTRELL D WELCH
Defendant: J HICKS, IHAN AZZAM, HANF and others
Stuart Robinson v. Clise Properties, Inc.
as 24-2604
Plaintiff: BARBARA A. STUART ROBINSON
Defendant: CLISE PROPERTIES, INC.
Rossi, et al. v. Becker, et al.
as 24-2565
Petitioner: STEPHEN ROSSI, KIM STEVENSON and HOWARD TARLOW
Respondent: GREG W. BECKER, DANIEL J. BECK, KAREN HON and others
United States of America v. Robinson
as 24-2482
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ROBBY LEE ROBINSON
United States of America v. Robinson
as 24-2487
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ROBBY LEE ROBINSON
Egu Uduka v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2468
Plaintiff: PRINCE EGU UDUKA
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02163
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?