Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Rawls v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-4646
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
Plaintiff:
JASON M. RAWLS
Jason M. Rawls v. United States of America et al
as 8:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Jason M Rawls and Jason M. Rawls
Defendant:
Secretary of the Army and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Aasir Azzarmi v. USDC-CALA
as 21-70715
Not Classified By Court:
RAVINDRA DADHICH, WILLIAM ITTOUNAS, SUSAN JUDSON and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Petitioner:
AASIR AZZARMI
USA v. David Rawls
as 21-10084
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID RAY RAWLS, AKA David R. Rawls
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ethel M. Webb Rawls v. Effen et al
as 2:2019cv09980
Defendant:
Effen and Michael Jackson Estate
Plaintiff:
Ethel M. Webb Rawls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Oklahoma Firefighters Pension v. Finisar Corporation, et al
as 19-16246
Defendant / Appellee:
EITAN GERTEL, FINISAR CORPORATION, JERRY S. RAWLS and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FINISAR CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Lead Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01072
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Bushansky v. Finisar Corporation et al
as 5:2019cv00446
Defendant:
Michael L. Dreyer, Robert N. Stephens, Helene Simonet and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Rawlings et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00452
Plaintiff:
John Stanford, Daniel Walker, Sandra Rivero and others
Defendant:
Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC, VM Motori S.p.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Davis v. Finisar Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv00271
Plaintiff:
William Davis
Defendant:
Michael L. Dreyer, Robert N. Stephens, Helene Simonet and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
