Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hemsley v. Hawk, et al.
as 23-3035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD DAVID HEMSLEY, One of we the people, Petitioner, Sui Juris, a living soul, created by God, a self governed individual, an ambassador of Christ, having taken dominion over Juris of the Land, Air, Water, this LAW and Richard of the House of Hemsley
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERY A. HAWK, as Judge, BRUCE A. LARSON, as Judge, WOODROW PENGELLY, as prosecutor and others
Estate of Richard D. Ramirez, et al v. Grant Morrison, et al
as 19-35089
Defendant / Appellant:
GRANT MORRISON, Officer
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RICHARD JORDAN RAMIREZ, by and through Conservator Julio Ramirez, JULIO RAMIREZ and ESTATE OF RICHARD DAVID RAMIREZ, by and through Personal Representative Julio Ramirez
Defendant:
DOES, John Does 1-10; Corporations A-J, RICH ST. JOHN, Chief and CITY OF BILLINGS, a municipal corporation of the State of Montana
USA v. Richard Hemsley
as 17-10494
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD DAVID HEMSLEY
USA v. Richard Hemsley
as 17-10149
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD DAVID HEMSLEY
Richard Wall v. USDC-WAESP
as 16-73707
:
In re: RICHARD DAVID WALL
Petitioner:
RICHARD DAVID WALL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SPOKANE
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Richard D. Come
as 12-80128
Respondent:
In re: RICHARD DAVID COMESS, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: June 2, 1999
USA v. Richard Lavalle
as 11-50528
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD DAVID LAVALLE
In re: Richard D. Comess, Esq.
as 10-80220
Respondent:
In re: RICHARD DAVID COMESS, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: June 2, 1999,
In the Matter of Richard David Corona - #56795
as 3:2008mc80044
Respondent:
Richard David Corona
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
