Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Scott v. Nevada Department of Corrections, et al.
as 24-6591
Defendant:
ROBERT ASHCRAFT, ECF No. 17, MEGHAN SULLIVAN, Added per FAC, ECF No. 19; Dismissed per 20, JOHN HENLEY, ECF No. 17: Added per FAC, ECF No. 19 and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD SCOTT, III
Puki v. County of Okanogan, et al.
as 24-3556
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE L. PUKI, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lori Langton
Defendant:
COUNTY OF OKANOGAN, OKANOGAN BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE, a Washington non-profit corporation, DAVID KOPP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Terrell v. Green Rush Advisory Group, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00886
Plaintiff:
Joshua Terrell
Defendant:
Green Rush Advisory Group, LLC, Healthy Healing Holistic Options, Inc. and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kristofer Seneca v. USDC-AZPIn re: Kristofer Seneca v. USDC-AZP
as 22-70268
Not Classified By Court:
In re: KRISTOFER MICHAEL SENECA, CYNTHIA M. KOEPPEL, named Cynthia M Koeppel (Nagron), CO IV, QUINN HARVEY, CO II and others
Petitioner:
KRISTOFER MICHAEL SENECA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Brian Rushing v. Romeo Power, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv06237
Plaintiff:
Brian Rushing
Defendant:
Romeo Power, Inc., Susan Brennan, Lauren Webb and others
Brian Rushing v. Romeo Power, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv01641
Plaintiff:
Brian Rushing
Defendant:
Romeo Power, Inc., Susan Brennan, Lauren Webb and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.