Cases 1 - 10 of 11
USA v. Sean Morton
as 22-50211
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SEAN DAVID MORTON
Sean Morton v. USDC-CALA
as 17-73215
:
In re: SEAN DAVID MORTON
Petitioner:
SEAN DAVID MORTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Sean Morton
as 17-50351
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SEAN DAVID MORTON
Sean Morton v. USDC-CALA
as 17-71708
:
In re: SEAN DAVID MORTON
Petitioner:
SEAN DAVID MORTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Sean Morton
as 17-50144
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SEAN DAVID MORTON
Sean David Morton et al v. United States Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02890
Defendant:
James C. Hughes, Valerie L. Makarewicz, United States Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa Morton and Sean David Morton
Christopher Bass v. Sean David Morton et al
as 2:2010cv03816
Defendant:
27 Investments LLC, Delphia Associates Investment Group, Magic Eight Ball Distributing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bass
Christopher Bass v. Sean David Morton et al
as 2:2010mc00168
Defendant:
27 Investments LLC, Delphia Associates Investment Group, Magic Eight Ball Distributing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bass
Sean David Morton et al v. Bennett Ellenbogen et al
as 2:2009cv01875
Plaintiff:
Sean David Morton and Melissa Morton
Defendant:
Bennett Ellenbogen, Tim Johnson, Eric Holder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sean Morton, et al v. Bennett Ellenbogen, et al
as 09-56041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAN DAVID MORTON and MELISSA MORTON
Defendant - Appellee:
BENNETT ELLENBOGEN, TIM JOHNSON, Erroneously Sued as Stephen Johnson, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
