Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 34
FritoMania de Casa Vieja, LLC, et al. v. Tarango, et al.
as 24-2785
Petitioner: FRITOMANIA CASA VIEJA, LLC and ANDRES TAPIA ANEZ
Respondent: TRACY TARANGO, Director, California Service Center, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, UR M. JADDOU, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Flores Limon, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2584
Plaintiff: BEATRIZ FLORES LIMON and JOSE ANTONIO HERNANDEZ REYES
Defendant: LOREN K. MILLER, Director, Nebraska Service Center, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, in his official capacity as well as his successors and assigns, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity as well as his successors and assigns, UR M. JADDOU, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, in her official capacity as well as her successor and assigns and others
Mejia, et al. v. Jaddou, et al.
as 23-4345
Plaintiff / Appellant: VITO MEJIA and THELMA MEJIA
Defendant / Appellee: UR M. JADDOU, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Defendant: DOES, 1 through 5, inclusive
Casa Libre Freedom House, et al. v. Mayorkas, et al.
as 23-2858
Plaintiff / Appellee: CASA LIBRE FREEDOM HOUSE, EL RESCATE, CLERGY AND LAITY UNITED FOR ECONOMIC JUSTICE and others
Defendant / Appellant: ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and UR M. JADDOU, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service
Francis Flores Faustino v. Irene Martin, et al
as 23-55792
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRANCIS JOSEPH FLORES FAUSTINO
Defendant / Appellee: IRENE MARTIN, San Bernardino Field Office District Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Yanfei Cai v. Secretary of Dept. of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2023cv03277
Petitioner: Yanfei Cai
Respondent: Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, Director of USCIS, Los Angeles District Director of the USCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Veenaben Patel, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 21-17024
Petitioner / Appellant: VEENABEN DHIRUBHAI PATEL and AJAY RAMABHAI PATEL
Respondent / Appellee: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Former U.S. Attorney General, CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, THOMAS HOMAN, Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Haisam Elsharkawi v. USA, et al
as 21-56206
Plaintiff / Appellant: HAISAM ELSHARKAWI
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity and TROY A. MILLER, Acting Commissioner of Customs and Border Protection
Faour Fraihat, et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs E, et al
as 21-55941
Plaintiff / Appellee: FAOUR ABDALLAH FRAIHAT, MARCO MONTOYA AMAYA, RAUL ALCOCER CHAVEZ and others
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Rafiak Algzaly, et al v. Anthony Blinken, et al
as 21-16375
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAFIAK MOHAMED ALGZALY, AFRAH ABDULJALIL ALGHAZALI, S.R.M.A. and others
Defendant / Appellee: ANTHONY J. BLINKEN, as Secretary of State, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?