Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America, Inc. et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 2:2017cv04768
Defendant:
Unique Logistics International Thailand Co., Ltd., BNSF Railway Company, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
American Mitsuba Corporation, Clarion Corporation of America, Federal Insurance Company and others
Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America v. Orient Overseas Container Line, Ltd. et al
as 2:2017cv04689
ThirdParty Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Defendant:
Does, Dynamic Worldwide Logistics, Inc. and Orient Overseas Container Line, Ltd.
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Orient Overseas Container Line, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America
AI Marine Adjustors et al v. Fleet Management, Ltd. et al
as 3:2015cv01658
Plaintiff:
AI Marine Adjustors , AIG New Zealand , AIG Global Marine & Energy and others
Defendant:
Fleet Management, Ltd., Regal Stone, Ltd. and John Cota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America v. Network FOB Inc et al
as 2:2013cv02851
Defendant:
LRC International LLC, Network FOB Inc, New Century Transport LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America
Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America v. Action Express LLC et al
as 2:2013cv02046
Defendant:
Action Express LLC and Does
Plaintiff:
Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America
Sompo Japan Insurance Company v. VIP Transport, Inc., et al
as 08-17535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOMPO JAPAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
VIP TRANSPORT, INC., a corporation and MAYFLOWER TRANSIT, LLC, a foreign corporation
Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America v. VIP Transport, Inc et al
as 5:2008cv01857
Plaintiff:
Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America and Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
VIP Transport, Inc and Mayflower Transit, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
