Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Fidel Robles v. T and T Furniture et al
as 8:2017cv01710
Defendant:
Life Style Furniture Inc., Romona A. Marshall and T and T Furniture
Plaintiff:
Fidel Rodriguez Robles
A. V. Thomas Produce, Inc., et al v. Cal-O Vegetable Exchange, Inc., et al
as 12-56886
Plaintiff - Appellee:
A. V. THOMAS PRODUCE, INC., a corporation, BENGARD RANCH, INC., a corporation, BOSKOVICH FARMS, INC. and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
GENE WHEELER FARMS, INC., GIUMARRA BROS FRUIT CO., INC., a California corporation, B & W QUALITY GROWERS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CAL-O VEGETABLE EXCHANGE, INC., a corporation and THOMAS H. KUNISAKI, an individual
Defendant:
CREDIT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, a corporation, assignee for the benefit of creditors and SCOTT N. KUNISAKI, an individual
A V Thomas Produce Inc et al v. Cal O Vegetable Exchange Inc et al
as 2:2012cv03933
Plaintiff:
A V Thomas Produce Inc, Bengard Ranch Inc, Boskovich Farms Inc and others
Defendant:
Cal O Vegetable Exchange Inc, Credit Management Association, Scott N Kunisaki and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Gene Wheeler Farms Inc
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Robert E. Lane et al
as 2:2009mc00255
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert E. Lane, Wealth Pools International, Inc., Recruit For Wealth, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Lane et al
as 5:2009mc80169
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission and Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert E. Lane, Wealth Pools International, Inc.,, Recruit For Wealth, Inc. and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lane et al
as 2:2007ms00082
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert E. Lane, Wealth Pools International, Inc., Recruit for Wealth, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
