Cases 1 - 10 of 31
United States of America v. Schneider
as 23-3899
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRY LEE SCHNEIDER, II
United States of America v. Schneider
as 23-1485
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRY LEE SCHNEIDER, II
Nichols v. Guidetoinsure, LLC
as 5:2023cv04920
Plaintiff:
Terri Lee Nichols
Defendant:
Guidetoinsure, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Nichols v. Travelopod Inc.
as 5:2023cv03360
Plaintiff:
Terri Lee Nichols
Defendant:
Travelopod Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
USA v. Terry Keehn, II
as 23-30031
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRY LEE KEEHN II, AKA Terry Keehn
USA v. Terry Schneider, II
as 22-10340
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRY LEE SCHNEIDER II
Nichols v. Credit Associates, LLC
as 5:2022cv08975
Plaintiff:
Terri Lee Nichols
Defendant:
Credit Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Nichols v. 360 Financial Group LLC
as 5:2022cv03899
Plaintiff:
Terri Lee Nichols
Defendant:
360 Financial Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Nichols v. Meredian Inc.
as 5:2022cv03897
Plaintiff:
Terri Lee Nichols
Defendant:
Meredian Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Where Do We Go Berkeley, et al v. Caltrans, et al
as 21-16790
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WHERE DO WE GO BERKELEY, KEVIN CODDINGTON, JOSE MORFIN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, TOKS OMISHAKIN, individually and in his official capacity ad Director of Caltrans and DINA EL-TAWANSY, individually and in her official capacity as Director of District Four
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
