Cases 1 - 10 of 228
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-3765
Petitioner:
KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party:
SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, A.R.W., by and through his father Kurt Benshoof, NATHAN CLIBER and others
Clinton v. Pollard, et al.
as 24-3706
Plaintiff:
MARKEITH CLINTON
Defendant:
M. POLLARD, Warden, R. BUCKEL, Chief Deputy Warden, S. STEADMAN, Associate Warden and others
Urmancheev v. Ndoh, et al.
as 24-3043
Plaintiff:
ALIM S. URMANCHEEV
Defendant:
R. NDOH, P. VERA, D GROVES and others
Thinn v. Johnson, et al.
as 24-2673
Petitioner:
CLINTON THINN
Respondent:
RAYBON JOHNSON, Warden and ROB BONTA
Van Huisen v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-842
Plaintiff:
GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PR, CLINTON ADMINISTRATION, K. BIEKER, CEO, CCC and others
Van Huisen v. Clinton Administration, et al.
as 24-401
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN
Defendant / Appellee:
CLINTON ADMINISTRATION, WILLIAM CLINTON, ED CORNEILUIS, Dealership Owner, Volkswagen, Santa Clara, Alameda County and others
Crisher v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al.
as 24-197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLINTON GLEN CRISHER
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, TRANSUNION and others
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SERVICES SPA
Brown v. Taylor
as 23-4131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLINTON BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
CLARK R. TAYLOR, AICP, The Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning
United States of America v. Bacchus
as 23-1857
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL CLINTON BACCHUS
Clinton Brown v. Emil Assentato
as 2:2023cv02972
Plaintiff:
Clinton Brown
Defendant:
Emil Assentato, Tax Deed Enterprises LLC and Steve Weera Tonasut Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
