Cases 1 - 10 of 98
United States of America v. Compton
as 24-2039
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LAMORSE COMPTON, JR.
Hall v. Kinsey, et al.
as 24-709
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
KATHERINE KINSEY, TARA MULAY, JEAN M. COSTANZA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Compton Unified School District v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv02901
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Pax Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc., Altria Group Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Compton Unified School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Compton Unified School District v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03619
Plaintiff:
Compton Unified School District
Defendant:
Altria Group, Inc., JUUL Labs, Inc., PAX Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Donald Tangwall v. Larry Compton, et al
as 23-35079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD A. TANGWALL
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY D. COMPTON, Bankruptcy Trustee, CABOT CHRISTIANSON, Attorney, Attorney for Larry Compton, GARY A. SPRAKER, Bankruptcy Judge and others
Loren Rancourt v. Joel Bolger, et al
as 23-35064
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOREN RANCOURT
Defendant / Appellee:
JOEL BOLGER, Honorable, MICHAEL SHAFFER, CAMERON COMPTON, Attorney and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
