Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 714
Walker v. O'Malley
as 24-3598
Plaintiff: JEFFREY DAVID WALKER
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Davis v. Walker, et al.
as 24-3465
Plaintiff: KENNARD LEE DAVIS
Defendant: JAMES WALKER, N. GRANNIS, S FLORY and others
Davis v. Walker, et al.
as 24-3467
Plaintiff: KENNARD LEE DAVIS
Defendant: JAMES WALKER, SAMUEL MCALPINE, CHERYL BAKEWELL and others
Walker v. People of the State of California
as 24-3435
Petitioner: ROY LEE WALKER
Respondent: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Mosley et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 3:2024cv03173
Plaintiff: Alexandria Mosley, Amy Caster, Amy Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Yoon et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02612
Plaintiff: Mary Yoon, William Martin and Kat Walker
Defendant: Meta Platforms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Warren v. Nanos, et al.
as 24-2601
Plaintiff: JOHNNY LEE WARREN
Defendant: CHRIS NANOS, Sheriff, LAURA CONOVER, County Attorney, SAMANTHA WALKER, CES Dut and others
Walker v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 24-1806
Plaintiff: EMMANUEL WALKER, as Guardian of an incapacitated adult on behalf of Issac Contreras
Defendant: STATE OF ARIZONA, AARON BOWEN, UNKNOWN BOWEN, husband and wife and others
Walker Specialty Construction, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Joint Pension Trust for Southern Nevada, et al.
as 24-1560
Plaintiff: WALKER SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Defendant: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND LABORERS JOINT PENSION TRUST FOR SOUTHERN NEVADA and THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND LABORERS PENSION TRUST FOR SOUTHERN NEVADA
Warren v. Walker John & Debra Trust, et al.
as 24-1538
Plaintiff: ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant: WALKER JOHN & DEBRA TRUST, BERHAN AHMEN, PROGRESS RESIDENTIAL BORROWER 8 L L C and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?