Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,810
Valdez v. Bennett
as 24-3780
Petitioner: SAMUEL F. VALDEZ
Respondent: JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Deonarine v. Aguilar, et al.
as 24-3665
Plaintiff: JOHN F. DEONARINE
Defendant: MONICA AGUILAR, Erroneously Sued As Lopez, LOPEZ, Police Officer, Los Angeles Police Dept., Serial No. 40598, individual and official capacity, ROSALES, Police Officer, Los Angeles Police Dept., Serial No. 43819, individual and official capacity and others
Villarroel et al v. Recology Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv03266
Plaintiff: William Villarroel, Liese L. Sand and Robert F. Sand
Defendant: Recology Inc., Recology San Francisco, Recology Golden Gate and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Curtis F. Robinson M.D. Inc. v. MultiPlan, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02993
Plaintiff: Curtis F. Robinson, M.D., Inc. on behalf of itself and others similarly situated doing business as Panoramic Medicine
Defendant: MultiPlan, Inc., Aetna, Inc., The Cigna Group and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Chavez Chavez v. Garland
as 24-3060
Petitioner: SANTOS F CHAVEZ CHAVEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Parks v. McAdorey
as 24-2955
Petitioner: EDWARD F. PARKS
Respondent: JOHN MCADOREY, WARDEN
Singh Banga v. Kanios, et al.
as 24-2917
Plaintiff: NAVJEET SINGH BANGA
Defendant: CHRIS GUS KANIOS, DEAN BARBIERI, ELEANOR ARMSTRONG and others
Buchanan v. Becker et al
as 5:2024cv02684
Plaintiff: Steven J. Buchanan
Defendant: Gregory W. Becker, Daniel J. Beck, Karen Hon and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Amersi v. Sheridan et al
as 3:2024cv00726
Plaintiff: Amin Amersi
Defendant: John F Sheridan, Leigh A Vosseller, Brian B Hansen and others
Rossi, et al. v. Becker, et al.
as 24-2565
Petitioner: STEPHEN ROSSI, KIM STEVENSON and HOWARD TARLOW
Respondent: GREG W. BECKER, DANIEL J. BECK, KAREN HON and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?