Cases 31 - 40 of 137
(PS) Jackson v. Josiah et al
as 2:2019cv00671
Defendant:
Claude Elton Josiah and Marsha J. Josiah
Plaintiff:
Robin E. Jackson
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Meuter et al
as 3:2018cv02112
Defendant:
Kimberly Carriaga, Jevon Carriaga, Jackson Meuter and others
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Redwood Property Investors II, LLC. v. Shepard et al
as 3:2018cv05912
Defendant:
Mary Shepard, Christopher Jackson and Verta C. Clark
Plaintiff:
Redwood Property Investors II, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Fairfield Warner LLC v. Wilson Jackson et al
as 2:2018cv07753
Defendant:
Does 1 to 10, inclusive and Wilson Jackson
Plaintiff:
Fairfield Warner LLC
Redwood Property Investors II, LLC. v. Shepard et al
as 3:2018cv01823
Plaintiff:
Redwood Property Investors II, LLC.
Defendant:
Mary Shepard, Verta C. Clark and Christopher Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Phillip Jackson v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, et al
as 17-56685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP D. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTAGE CORPORATION, Freddie Mac and DOES, 1-10, inclusive
Rabco Investments, LLC v. Wilson E. Jackson et al
as 2:2017cv01868
Defendant:
Does, Alisha M. Jackson and Wilson E. Jackson
Plaintiff:
Rabco Investments, LLC
Mehoves et al v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00103
Counter Claimant:
CMH Homes, Inc.
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Verla Jackson and Jeffery Mehoves
Plaintiff:
Verla Jackson and Jeffery Mehoves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Kush Gulmatico v. Rick Jackson et al
as 5:2017cv00270
Defendant:
Does and Rick Jackson
Plaintiff:
Kush Gulmatico
America Bracho et al v. Tyrone Jackson et al
as 2:2017cv01174
Plaintiff:
America Bracho and Felix Nunez
Defendant:
Does, Lauren Jackson and Tyrone Jackson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
