Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Idaho Department of Transportation v. Friends of the Weiser River Trail, et al
as 1:2012cv00456
Plaintiff:
Idaho Department of Transportation
Defendant:
Friends of the Weiser River Trail and Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
UPRC v. Guard Dog Heaven, LLC
as 12-16894
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
GUARD DOG HEAVEN, LLC
County of Clark v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2012cv00648
Defendant:
Lewis B. Atkin, Heirs and Devisees of Lewis B. Atkin, deceased and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
County of Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hatcher et al v. City of Porterville et al
as 1:2011cv02015
Plaintiff:
Buddy Hatcher and Holley Hatcher
Defendant:
City of Porterville, County of Tulare, RailAmerica, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hoots vs D. Earl Harris, et al
as 3:2011cv00109
Defendant:
Lillian Harris Blamires, Morris Blamires, Helen Harris Dillman and others
Plaintiff:
Martha P. Hoots
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Ti
Hoots vs Federal Land Bank of Berkeley, et al
as 3:2011cv00110
Defendant:
Federal Land Bank of Berkeley and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Martha P. Hoots
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Ti
Dayton Valley Investors, LLC v. UPRC
as 10-17423
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
DAYTON VALLEY INVESTORS, LLC, doing business as Lakemount homes
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Twin City Foods, Inc. v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 3:2010cv00422
Plaintiff:
Twin City Foods, Inc.
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company, Camas Prairie Railnet, Inc., Union Pacific Railroad Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Rubber Lining Specialists LLC et al
as 5:2010cv01181
Defendant:
Does and Rubber Lining Specialists LLC
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Stockton v. Burlington Northern, et al
as 2:2010cv00634
Plaintiff:
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Stockton
Defendant:
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
