Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Blackmon v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Division of Adult Parole Operations et al
as 4:2012cv01185
Plaintiff:
Valdez Blackmon
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Division of Adult Parole Operations, J. Larson, James Scaver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maria-Gollihar v. County of San Joaquin, et al
as 2:2010cv00135
Plaintiff:
Michelle Maria-Gollihar
Defendant:
County of San Joaquin, San Joaquin County Sheriff's Department, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Andre-Gollihar v. County of San Joaquin, et al
as 2:2009cv03313
Plaintiff:
Sandra Andre-Gollihar
Defendant:
County of San Joaquin, San Joaquin County Sheriff's Department, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Wilson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 4:2008cv03358
Plaintiff:
Robin Wilson
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Pelican Bay State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2008cv03358
Plaintiff:
Robin Wilson
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Pelican Bay State Prison
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson et al v. Chappell et al
as 2:2007at00512
Plaintiff:
Luellar Johnson, Alexandra Dorris and Luellar Johnson
Defendant:
Jonathan Chappell, State of California and Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Petitioner:
Jonathan Chappell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Johnson et al v. Chappell et al
as 2:2007cv01126
Plaintiff:
Luellar Johnson, Alexandra Dorris, Jonathan Chappell and others
Defendant:
State of California and Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
