Cases 41 - 50 of 63
ABARCA et al v. COOK et al
as 1:2013at00753
Plaintiff:
ARTURO ABARCA , CRISTINA ABARCA, DENISE ABARCA and others
Petitioner:
LISA EDDINGS-ROSS, CHRISTIE HAMILTON, BRANDON HENSON and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co. Inc., Baltimore Aircoil Company and Amsted Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eugene Lee v. Huntington Park Police Department et al
as 2:2013cv07004
Defendant:
City of Huntington Park, Officer Ricardo Curiel, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Lee
Ricardo Ramirez v. Wyeth LLC et al
as 2:2013cv02026
Defendant:
Alaven Pharmaceutical, LLC, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Ramirez
Terrance Tribbey et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 8:2012cv02048
Defendant:
AAI Development Services Inc, Aaipharma Inc, Aaipharma LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Altizer, Darlene Barry, Helen Blosser and others
Ricardo Lara et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2012cv08469
Defendant:
Lee Baca, Lee Baca, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Ana Lara and Ricardo Lara
Shane Maddox Bruce v. Jeremy Suetos et al
as 2:2012cv07263
Plaintiff:
Shane Maddox Bruce
Defendant:
Ricardo Hernandez, Jeremy Suetos and Ventura DMV Investigation Division
Ricardo Palacios v. United States of America et al
as 8:2012cv01335
Defendant:
Does and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Palacios
Angel Alfonso Rivero et al v. Boston Scientific et al
as 5:2011cv00727
Defendant:
Boston Scientific and Does
Plaintiff:
Ana Julia Rivero, Angel Alfonso Rivero, Angel Manuel Rivero and others
Estate Plaintiff:
Angel Alfonso Rivero
Ricardo Davila v. Jeremy Willis et al
as 5:2010cv01207
Defendant:
CR England Inc, Does and Jeremy M Willis
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Davila
Kaur v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2010cv01149
Plaintiff:
Parvinder Kaur
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Ricardo Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
