Cases 61 - 70 of 88
Straup v. Zacharko, Jr. et al
as 3:2012cv01677
Plaintiff:
Matthew Straup
Defendant:
Taras Michael Zacharko, Jr. , Customs & Border Protection [CBP] , Department of Homeland Security [DPS] and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Limon-Rodriguez v. Department of Homeland Security
as 3:2012cv00833
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Limon-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
McBrien v. City and County of San Mateo et al
as 3:2011cv05612
Plaintiff:
Karen McBrien
Defendant:
City and County of San Mateo, San Mateo Sheriff, Greg Munks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McBrien v. City and County of San Mateo et al
as 4:2011cv05612
Plaintiff:
Karen McBrien
Defendant:
City and County of San Mateo, San Mateo Sheriff, Greg Munks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenney v. Japan et al
as 2:2011cv05341
Defendant:
AIA, AIG, AT and T and others
Plaintiff:
John B Kenney
Kyoto Young Womens Academy:
Kyoto Jyosei Gakuin
MacDonald v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2011cv01088
Plaintiff:
Fred Kenneth MacDonald
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security , Kent D. Haroldsen, John Garzon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hall et al v. Rocha et al
as 3:2011cv00511
Plaintiff:
Megan Hall and Scott Hall
Defendant:
Ruben Rocha, United States Department of Homeland Security , United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
John B Kenney v. Japan et al
as 2:2011cv00630
Defendant:
AIA, AIG, AT and T and others
Plaintiff:
John B Kenney
Wayne Powell v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv00357
Defendant:
Does, Shaun M Jackson, Shaun M Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Powell
Alex P Thorn v. Homeland Security
as 2:2011cv00257
Defendant:
Homeland Security
Plaintiff:
Alex P Thorn
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
