Torts - Injury Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 171
Maria Esmeralda Garcia Gutierrez et al v. Karen Lee Martinez et al
as 2:2024cv03486
Plaintiff: MARIA ESMERALDA GARCIA GUTIERREZ, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to THE ESTATE OF ISAAC VAZQUEZ BARBA, MONICA VAZQUEZ GARCIA, a minor by and through her Guardian ad Litem, MARIA ESMERALDA GARCIA GUTIERREZ, ISSAC VAZQUEZ GARCIA and others
Defendant: KAREN LEE MARTINEZ, individually and SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE JOHN WILLIAM BOSSETT AND DELORES MARIE FAMILY TRUST, JOHN WILLIAM BOSSETT, JR., Karen Lee Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Gomez et al v. Dungo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01744
Plaintiff: Vivian Gomez, Lilian Sara Gomez, a minor represented by her Guardian ad Litem, Monica Espinoza, Arturo Gomez, Jr., a minor represented by his Guardian ad Litem, Antonieta Uribes and others
Defendant: Jeffrey Dungo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Estate of Michael McCormack, et al v. County of San Bernardino, et al
as 23-55744
Plaintiff / Appellant: ESTATE OF MICHAEL MCCORMACK, by and through his successor in interest Melinda Jacobson McCormack and MELINDA JACOBSON MCCORMACK, by and through her Guardian ad Litem, James McCormack
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SANDRO XAVIER RIVERA and others
Raul Perez, et al v. USDA, et al
as 23-16139
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAUL R. PEREZ, individually and as the Successor in Interest to the Estate of A.P., BRITTANY L. PEREZ, N. R. P., a minor by and through his guardian ad litem Brittany L. Perez and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Estate of Joann Vass, The v. GW Manager LLC
as 1:2023cv00324
Plaintiff: The Estate of Joann Vass by her Personal Representative Suzanne Rashidian, Suzanne Rashidian and Estate of Joann Vass, The
Counter Claimant: GW Manager LLC
Defendant: John Does 1-20, Jane Does 1-20, Doe Corporations 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
A. H., et al v. Ahmad Khalifa, et al
as 22-56061
Plaintiff / Appellee: A. H., a minor by and through her Guardian Ad Litem Sandra Guzman and SANDRA GUZMAN, individually
Defendant / Appellant: AHMAD KHALIFA, M.D., BORZOUYEH POURSHARIF, M.D. and EISNER PEDIATRIC & FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER, DBA Eisners Health Los Angeles Womens Center
Defendant / Appellee: FARNAAZ KIA, M.D. and DIGNITY HEALTH, Erroneously sued as California Hospital Medical Center
Defendant: DOES, 1 to 100
Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: J. D. v. Altria Group, Inc., et al
as 22-16693
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant: ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC and others
Defendant: JUUL LABS, INC., PAX LABS, INC., NU MARK LLC and others
Amicus Curiae: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
Harvey Smith v. Sunrise Operations, LLC, et al
as 23-15921
Plaintiff / Appellant: HARVEY SMITH
Defendant / Appellee: SUNRISE OPERATIONS, LLC and M/V HORIZON SPIRIT, her engines, tackle, furniture, apparel etc.
Defendant: PASHA GROUP
Harvey Smith v. Sunrise Operations, LLC, et al
as 23-15960
Plaintiff / Appellee: HARVEY SMITH
Defendant / Appellant: SUNRISE OPERATIONS, LLC
Defendant: M/V HORIZON SPIRIT, her engines, tackle, furniture, apparel etc. and PASHA GROUP
Z. R., et al v. USA
as 23-15550
Plaintiff / Appellant: Z. R., by and through her guardian ad litem Tanisha Porter and TANISHA PORTER
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?