Torts - Injury Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Donald Wagda, et al v. AT&T Corp., et al
as 22-16173
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL. DONALD WAGDA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL. DONALD CLOYCE WAGDA
Intervenor Plaintiff: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Defendant / Appellee: AT&T CORP., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T MOBILITY II LLC and others
Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bill Haviland v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv09503
Defendant: AT and T Corp., Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff: Bill Haviland
William Davidson, et al v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., et al
as 16-17252
Plaintiff - Appellee: WILLIAM DAVIDSON and PEARL DAVIDSON
Defendant - Appellant: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC., as successor in-interest to Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc.and Western Electric Compnay Inc., AKA Bell Laboratories, AKA Bell Labs, AKA BTL, FKA Lucent Technologies, Inc., AT&T CORP., individually and as successor in interest to Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Company, Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc. AT&T Long Lines and Western Electric Company Inc., AKA Bell Laboratories, AKA Bell Labs, AKA and PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, individually and as successor in interest to Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Company, Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., AT&T Long Lines and Western Electric Company Inc., AKA Bell Laboratories
Defendant: NOKIA USA INC., individually and as successor in interest to Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc. and Western Electric Company Inc.
Davidson et al v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv05766
Plaintiff: William Davidson and Pearl Davidson
Defendant: Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , AT&T Corp. , Pacific Bell Telephone Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?