Cases 101 - 110 of 13,981
Earley v. Doctor Mental Health et al
as 2:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Marc A. Earley
Defendant:
Doctor Mental Health, C.O., Sgt. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Wolfson et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Petitioner:
Leo Lionel Alvarez
Respondent:
Steve B. Wolfson and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moran v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00123
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Moran, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Nevada and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. GNLV Corp
as 2:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Lopez
Defendant:
GNLV Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Centeno v. Ballou et al
as 2:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Gerold Centeno
Defendant:
Erika Ballou and Heather Ungermann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wilkes v. Henley et al
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Kareem David Wilkes
Defendant:
Henley, Jessica Rambur, Voss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santistevan v. Thompson et al
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Jerry Santistevan
Defendant:
Megan Thompson, Michael Giles, Stefany Miley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitesell v. Nye County Sherriffs Office et al
as 2:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
John Tony Whitesell
Defendant:
Nye County Sherriffs Office and Serenity Healthcare Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brumfield v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00652
Petitioner:
Keith Deon Brumfield
Respondent:
Brian Williams and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
