Cases 121 - 130 of 14,012
Wallen v. Reubart et al
as 2:2024cv00586
Petitioner:
Heather Louise Wallen
Respondent:
William Reubart and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Austion v. USA
as 2:2024cv00578
Petitioner:
Jasmine Bernard Austion
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kennedy v. Oliver
as 3:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Kennedy
Defendant:
Ronald E. Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Austion v. Withers
as 2:2024cv00579
Petitioner:
Jasmine Benard Austion
Defendant:
Shanon D Withers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore v. Warden Oliver et al
as 2:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Allan Moore
Defendant:
Warden Oliver, Chief Witmore, O.M.D. and Director Dzurenda, Doc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldassarre v. Warden Bean et al.
as 2:2024cv00574
Petitioner:
Joshua J. Baldassarre
Respondent:
Warden Bean and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meas v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Jerry Meals and Jerry Meas
Defendant:
State of Nevada, James Dzurenda, Charles Daniels and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re Kentrell D. Welch
as 3:2024cv00140
Not Yet Classified:
Kentrell D. Welch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
James E. Hill
Defendant:
Julie Williams and C. Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkes v. Henley et al
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Kareem David Wilkes
Defendant:
Henley, Jessica Rambur, Voss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
