Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Hoak v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2012cv00131
Plaintiff:
Larry M Hoak
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Fourth Judicial Court, Alan Trimming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoak v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2012cv00132
Plaintiff:
Larry M Hoak
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Alan Trimming, Taresa Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoak v. Valdez et al
as 1:2010cv00250
Plaintiff:
Arthur A Hoak
Defendant:
Valdez and Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoak v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00138
Plaintiff:
Larry M Hoak
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Johanna Smith, Idaho Correction Center of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoak v. Smith et al
as 1:2009cv00680
Plaintiff:
Larry M Hoak
Defendant:
Smith, Sheryl Salaris, Larry Hynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur Hoak v. Valdez
as 09-36115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR ALLEN HOAK
Defendant - Appellee:
VALDEZ, ICCA Warden
Larry Hoak, et al v. Valdez, et al
as 09-36094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY M. HOAK
Plaintiff:
SHANE ELLOYD ROMERO, SHAUN M. GILBERT, ARTHUR ALLEN HOAK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VALDEZ, Warden, CORRECTION CORPORATION OF AMERICA, JOHN HARDISON and others
Hoak v. State of Idaho
as 1:2009cv00409
Petitioner:
Arthur A Hoak
Respondent:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoak v. State of Idaho
as 1:2009cv00389
Petitioner:
Larry M Hoak
Respondent:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoak v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv00338
Plaintiff:
Larry M Hoak
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Sheila Lundquist, Dave Pasket and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
