Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Demos v. The United States et al
as 1:2020cv00104
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
The State of Washington and The United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2020cv00004
Defendant:
United States, John Doe, State of Idaho and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly and N. Byerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boettner v. United States of America
as 4:2019cv00501
Petitioner:
David John Boettner, Jr
Respondent:
USA and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Zavala v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv00476
Petitioner:
Juan Antonio Zavala
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hawkins v. Idaho State Board of Correction et al
as 1:2018cv00084
Plaintiff:
Faron R. Hawkins
Defendant:
Idaho State Board of Correction, Keith Yordy, CL Otter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner et al v. Ada County et al
as 1:2018cv00058
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Bonner, Detrick Curtis Conerly, Michael Griffith and others
Defendant:
Ada County, Canyon County, IDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2017cv00348
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Defendant:
State of Idaho, United States of America, C. L. Otter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Hawkins v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv00240
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Defendant:
United States of America, Bush, Winmill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
