Cases 61 - 70 of 122
Laird v. Smith et al
as 1:2011cv00541
Plaintiff:
Anthony Laird
Defendant:
Johanna Smith, Brent Reinke, Lawrence Wasden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blanc v. Pocatello Women's Correctional Center et al
as 4:2011cv00550
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Blanc
Defendant:
Pocatello Women's Correctional Center, Brent Reinke, Jim Woolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brakke v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00455
Plaintiff:
Randolph E Brakke, Sr
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections , ISCI, Brent Reinke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhoades v. Reinke et al
as 1:2011cv00445
Plaintiff:
Paul Ezra Rhoades
Defendant:
Brent Reinke , Randy Blades and Does 1-50, Unknown Executioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Reinke et al
as 1:2011cv00432
Plaintiff:
DeWayne Noble Banks
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Shane Evans, Renae LP James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maschek v. Valdez et al
as 3:2011cv00369
Plaintiff:
Spencer Maschek
Defendant:
Philip Valdez, Norma Rodriguez, Christopher Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blanc et al v. Reinke et al
as 4:2011cv00333
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Blanc, Sandy Jonas, Kathryn Vann and others
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Jim Woolf, LeeAnne Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baccus v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00351
Plaintiff:
Thomas Baccus, Jr
Defendant:
Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy, Caroling Melinie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00354
Plaintiff:
James Earl Newman
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Pam Sonnen, Joanna Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beeson v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00352
Plaintiff:
Milo Beeson
Defendant:
Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy, Caroling Melinie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
