Cases 1 - 10 of 323
Jones v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv01686
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Jones, Jr. and Chris Lee Washington
Defendant:
CCDC Medical Provider, CCDC Nurses, Clark County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00386
Defendant:
Susan Jackson, Timekeeper NDOC, Mary Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tonnochy v. Lewis et al
as 3:2024cv00375
Defendant:
Deputy Lee, Sheriff Darin Balaam, Lt. Colacurcio and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Tonnochy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thayer v. USA
as 2:2024cv01010
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Douglas Lee Thayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Finley v. Stephanie, Well Path Medical Director
as 2:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Finley
Defendant:
Stephanie, Well Path Medical Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Thayer v. USA
as 2:2024cv00465
Petitioner:
Douglas Lee Thayer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Womack v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Alfonzo Lee Womack
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Womack v. USA
as 2:2023cv01984
Petitioner:
Alfonzo Lee Womack
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bledsoe v. Lee et al
as 2:2023cv01974
Plaintiff:
Clemmie B Bledsoe, Jr
Defendant:
Chris Lee, Leslie Parks and Phung Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finley v. Fernando et al
as 2:2023cv01808
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Finley
Defendant:
Dettoro Fernando, F.P. and Mesia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
