Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Wickham v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Joshua Aaron Wickham
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Centurian Care Providers, Shift Commander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prall v. Holm, et al.
as 1:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Edwin W. Prall, II and Edwin Prall, II
Defendant:
Kasey Holm, Rona Siegert, Kara Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Medical Provider Rogers
as 1:2021cv00094
Defendant:
Medical Provider Rogers
Plaintiff:
Ronald G Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sileoni v. IDOC Staff Health Providers
as 1:2021cv00023
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Sileoni
Defendant:
IDOC Staff Health Providers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Newman et al
as 1:2020cv00438
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Jackson
Defendant:
Hughes, Don Newman and 2 Medical Providers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
East v. Nez Perce County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2020cv00260
Defendant:
Deputy Vogel, Joe Rodriguez, R.N. Darah Grogan and others
Plaintiff:
Michael John East
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2017cv00467
Plaintiff:
Richard Paul Meyers
Defendant:
Ramirez, Idaho Department of Correction and Corizon Mental Health Care Providers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villarreal v. Donahue et al
as 1:2015cv00580
Plaintiff:
Victor Villarreal
Defendant:
Donahue, Miller, Andrew Kuni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crisler v. Lincoln et al
as 1:2014cv00548
Plaintiff:
Robin Carl Crisler
Defendant:
Lincoln, Hjelm, Grunewald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfe v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv00227
Plaintiff:
William Wolfe
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Brent Reinke, Corizon Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
