Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Scott v. Clifford et al
as 1:2024cv00425
Defendant:
Brad Little, Ada County Commissioner and Matthew Clifford
Plaintiff:
Amelia Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Musgrove v. Parole Board Commission of Idaho et al
as 1:2024cv00394
Defendant:
Millisa Windrow, Raul Labrador, Shelley W. Armstrong and others
Petitioner:
Theodore E Musgrove
Respondent:
Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2024cv00333
Defendant:
Chad Page, Director of Wadda Potatoe Farms, Benjamin Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Charee Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruck v. Ada County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Scott C Bruck
Defendant:
Ada County Sheriff's Office, Greater Idaho Fugitive Task Force, Ada County Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. USA
as 1:2023cv00404
Petitioner:
Scott Arlis Thomas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Laney v. USA
as 1:2023cv00383
Petitioner:
Scott Alexander Laney
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stone v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Scott Stone
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Josh Tewalt, Judge B. Lynn Winmill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Scott Stone
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Eliason
as 1:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Alex David Tony Scott
Defendant:
MD Scott Anders Eliason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson v. Price et al
as 4:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Roy Elize Ferguson, III
Defendant:
Janiece Price, Scott A Pearson and State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
