Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Wilson Chan v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2023cv10131
Plaintiff:
Wilson Chan
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America and Raytheon Company Group Long Term Care Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
ARIOLA et al v. RAYTHEON (CA) TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv04686
Plaintiff:
LEOPOLDO ARIOLA
Petitioner:
RAYTHEON COMPANY
Defendant:
RAYTHEON (CA) TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Leopoldo Ariola et al v. Raytheon CA Technologies Corporation
as 2:2023cv04691
Plaintiff:
Leopoldo Ariola
Petitioner:
RAYTHEON COMPANY
Defendant:
RAYTHEON (CA) TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, Raytheon CA Technologies Corporation, Ratheon Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Leopoldo Ariola et al v. Raytheon CA Technologies Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv04664
Plaintiff:
Leopoldo Ariola
Petitioner:
Raytheon Company
Defendant:
Raytheon (CA) Technologies Corporation, Raytheon CA Technologies Corporation and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
(PS) Moreland v. Raytheon Company
as 2:2019cv00906
Plaintiff:
Gloria Etta Moreland
Defendant:
Raytheon Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Elizabeth Clara Russell v. Raytheon Company
as 2:2016cv02390
Defendant:
Raytheon Company
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Clara Russell
Charles Loyd v. Raytheon Company et al
as 8:2015cv01869
Defendant:
Does, Raytheon Company, Raytheon Non-Bargaining Retirement Plan and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Loyd
Robinette Burns v. Raytheon Company et al
as 2:2013cv05554
Plaintiff:
Robinette Burns
Defendant:
Does and Raytheon Company
Cheryl Diaz v. Raytheon Company et al
as 2:2013cv05553
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Diaz
Defendant:
Does, Nakishna Ellis and Raytheon Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
