Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Duane Cameron v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, et al
as 22-56148
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DUANE CAMERON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Defendant:
USC VERDUGO HILLS HOSPITAL GROUP LONG-TERM DISABILITY BENEFIT PLAN and DOES, 1 through 10
Duane Cameron v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada et al
as 2:2021cv02092
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, USC Verdugo Hills Hospital Group Long-Term Disability Benefit Plan and Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Duane Cameron
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Corine Smith v. University of Southern California et al
as 2:2018cv06111
Plaintiff:
Corine Smith
Defendant:
University of Southern California (USC), Broadspire Services, Inc., Does 1 to 10, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Allen Munro, et al v. USC, et al
as 17-55550
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALLEN L. MUNRO, individually and as representatives of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the University of Southern California Defined Contribution Retirement Plan and the University of Southern California Tax Deferred Annuity Plan, DANIEL C. WHEELER, individually and as representatives of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the University of Southern California Defined Contribution Retirement Plan and the University of Southern California Tax Deferred Annuity Plan, EDWARD E. VAYNMAN, individually and as representatives of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the University of Southern California Defined Contribution Retirement Plan and the University of Southern California Tax Deferred Annuity Plan and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, USC RETIREMENT PLAN OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE and LISA MAZZOCCO
Allen L. Munro et al v. University of Southern California et al
as 2:2016cv06191
Defendant:
University of Southern California, USC Retirement Plan Oversight Committee, Lisa Mazzocco and others
Plaintiff:
Allen L. Munro, Daniel C. Wheeler, Edward E. Vaynman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Juan Michael Torres v. Keck Medical Center of USC
as 2:2012cv09199
Defendant:
Keck Medical Center of USC
Plaintiff:
William Hooper and Juan Michael Torres
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Spencer Recovery Centers, Inc. v. Marukyo USA Inc Health Plan
as 08-56078
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SPENCER RECOVERY CENTERS, INC., a California corporation, individually and as Assignee of and successor in interest to James Youngblood, the plan participant and/or beneficiary and claimant
Defendant - Appellant:
MARUKYO USA INC HEALTH PLAN, an Employee welfare Benefit Plan, established pursuant to 29 USC 1001 et seq (ERISA)
Spencer Recovery Centers, Inc. v. Eval Company of America Medica
as 08-56081
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SPENCER RECOVERY CENTERS, INC., a California corporation, individually and as assignee of and successor in interest to James Youngblood, the plan participant and/or beneficiary and claimant
Defendant - Appellant:
EVAL COMPANY OF AMERICA MEDICAL PLAN, an Employee Welfare Benefit Plan, established pursuant to 29 USC 1001 et seq (ERISA)
USC-Kenneth Norris Jr. Cancer Hospital et al v. Aetna Health California, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv03710
Plaintiff:
USC-Kenneth Norris Jr. Cancer Hospital, USC-Kenneth Norris Jr. Cancer Hospital, USC-Kenneth Norris Jr. Cancer Hospital and others
Defendant:
Aetna Health California, Inc., Aetna Health California, Inc., Aetna Health Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Spencer Recovery Centers, Inc. v. Marukyo USA Inc Health Plan
as 08-55478
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SPENCER RECOVERY CENTERS, INC., a California corporation, individually and as Assignee of and successor in interest to Alvin Morita, the plan participant and/or beneficiary and claimant
Defendant - Appellant:
MARUKYO USA INC HEALTH PLAN, an Employee welfare Benefit Plan, established pursuant to 29 USC 1001 et seq (ERISA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
