Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 91 - 100 of 268
Dunn et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv00724
Plaintiff: Martin Dunn and Karen Dunn
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Crane Co. , Blackmer Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rosalie Jean Nelson v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00811
Ued As Successor-by-merger To Buffalo Pumps, Inc: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To The Delaval Separator Company: Alfa Laval Inc
Ued As Successor-in-interest To Thursh Company And H.A. Thrush Company: Amtrol Inc
Defendant: Armstrong International Inc, CLA-VAL Co, Cameron International Corporation and others
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Chapman Valve Company, Deming Pump Company, Jenkin: Crane Co
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Mundet Cork Company: Crown Cork and Seal Company Inc
Ued As Successor To Sierra Talc Company And United Talc Company: Cyprus Amax Minerals Company
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Northern Pump Company Fka Northern Fire Apparatu: FMC Corporation
Ued As Successor To Edward Valve, Inc: Flowserve US Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Henry Valve Co: Henry Technologies Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Delaval Turbine, Inc., And C.H. Wheeler Manufactur: IMO Industries
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Robertshaw Controls Company Dba Fulton Sylphon Val: Invensys Systems Inc
Plaintiff: Rosalie Jean Nelson
Ued Successor-in-interest To Klipfel Valves, Inc: O C Keckley Company
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To International Talc Company: RT Vanderbilt Company Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Zurn Industries, Inc: Zurn Industries LLC
Nelson et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00793
Defendant: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc, Amtrol Inc and others
Plaintiff: Rosalie Jean Nelson and Rosalie Jean Nelson
Deason et al v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05667
Plaintiff: James Deason and Mary Deason
Defendant: National Steel and Shipbuilding Company , A.W. Chesterton Company , Astra Flooring Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Allen et al v. Flowserve US Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv04495
Plaintiff: Michael Allen and Carla Allen
Defendant: Flowserve US Inc., Ingersoll-Rand Company, Flowserve Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Allen et al v. Flowserve US Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv04495
Plaintiff: Michael Allen and Carla Allen
Defendant: Flowserve US Inc., Ingersoll-Rand Company, Flowserve Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Richard Lee et al v. Alfa Laval Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv07333
Defendant: Alfa Laval Inc, CBS Corporation, CSR Ltd and others
Plaintiff: Mary Lee and Richard Lee
Mecham et al v. American Oil Company et al
as 4:2011cv04393
Plaintiff: Carol Ann Mecham , Michelle Ivey , Jodi Phillips and others
Defendant: American Oil Company, CBS Corporation, Conagra Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bond et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv04199
Plaintiff: Marisa Bond and Allen Pagan
Defendant: A.W. Chesterton Company, Abb, Inc., Gould, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Clifford Kiener et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv06438
Ued As Successor-by-merger To Buffalo Pumps, Inc: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation
Defendant: Elliott Turbo Machinery Company, John Crane Inc, Syd Carpenter Marine Contractor Inc and others
Plaintiff: Clifford Kiener and Darlene Kiener

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?