Cases 111 - 120 of 149
Cheryl Kelmar v. Bank of America Corporation, et al
as 13-55046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHERYL KELMAR, JD and MSEE
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, HARBOR VIEW MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2006-12 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cheryl Kelmar v. USDC-CALA
as 12-73649
:
In re: CHERYL KELMAR
Petitioner:
CHERYL KELMAR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, HARBOR VIEW MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, 2006-12 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv07784
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv07320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cheryl Kelmar v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv06826
Defendant:
Gina Albertson, Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory and Natsis LLP, Bank of America Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Kelmar
In re: Cheryl Kelmar v. USDC-CALA
as 12-72332
:
In re: CHERYL KELMAR
Petitioner:
CHERYL KELMAR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, HARBOR VIEW MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, 2006-12, WELLS FARGO BANK LTD. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mae Wood v. Real Time Resolutions Inc et al
as 2:2012cv03916
Defendant:
Does and Real Time Resolutions Inc
Plaintiff:
Mae Wood
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
