Cases 121 - 130 of 561
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05480
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00836
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00818
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00718
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00720
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00722
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00702
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
He v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2021cv00623
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Tracy Renaud and others
Plaintiff:
Yuemei He
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Rastogi v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2021cv00592
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Plaintiff:
Rakhi Rastogi
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Hebron et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2021cv00405
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Plaintiff:
Imelda Umali Hebron, Emmanuel Rolly Misola Hebron and Emmanuel Rodli Umali Hebron
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
