Cases 11 - 20 of 45
In re Exparte Application for Nokia Corporation et al v. Broadcom Corporation et al
as 8:2013mc00011
Defendant:
Broadcom Corporation and HTC Corporation
In Re:
In re Exparte Application for Nokia Corporation
Plaintiff:
Nokia Corporation
In re Ex Parte Application of Nokia Corporation
as 8:2013mc00010
Defendant:
Broadcom Corporation
Plaintiff:
Nokia Corporation
In re Ex Parte Application of Nokia Corporation
as 3:2013cv01152
Plaintiff:
Nokia Corporation
Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MircoUnity Systems Engineering, Inc. et al v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 5:2013mc80020
Plaintiff:
MircoUnity Systems Engineering, Inc.
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC and others
Objector:
Adobe Systems, Inc.
Nokia Corporation et al v. Reasearch In Motion Limited et al
as 5:2012cv05992
Petitioner:
Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc
Respondent:
Reasearch In Motion Limited and Research In Motion Corporation
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 201 Petition for Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Award
Nokia GmbH and Nokia Corporation
as 3:2012cv02653
Plaintiff:
Nokia GmbH and Nokia Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GPNE Corp. v. Nokia Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv03056
Plaintiff:
GPNE Corp.
Defendant:
Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
GPNE Corp. v. Nokia Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00250
Plaintiff:
GPNE Corp.
Defendant:
Nokia Corporation and Nokia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v. Nokia Corporation et al
as 5:2012cv01218
Plaintiff:
Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Nokia Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v. Nokia Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv01218
Plaintiff:
Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Nokia Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
