Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 47
SEMA v. Elaine Chao, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-72623
Petitioner: SPECIALTY EQUIPMENT MARKET ASSOCIATION
Respondent: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, JAMES OWENS, Acting Administrator of NHTSA and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: SPECIALTY EQUIPMENT MARKET ASSOCIATION
S. Mendel v. USDC-CAOAK
as 19-72420
Not Yet Classified: MARITZA PEREZ, in her individual and official capacity as Section Supervisor Badge #11 Transportationb License Section California Public Utilities Commission, RAISER-CA LLC, ELAINE L. CHAO, in her official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Transportation and others
Petitioner: S. PATRICK MENDEL
Not Classified By Court: In re: S. PATRICK MENDEL
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
State of Nevada v. Elaine Chao, et al
as 19-71918
Respondent: RONALD L. BATORY, Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ELAINE L. CHAO, Secretary of Transportation and others
Petitioner: STATE OF NEVADA
CPUC v. Elaine Chao, et al
as 19-71802
Respondent: RONALD L. BATORY, Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration, FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION, ELAINE L. CHAO, Secretary of Transportation and others
Petitioner: CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
USA, et al v. USDC-ORE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-71928
: In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, SHAUN DONOVAN and others
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Real Party In Interest: KELSEY CASCADIA ROSE JULIANA, XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK and others
Kayla Willis, et al v. City of Seattle, et al
as 17-80214
Plaintiff - Petitioner: KAYLA WILLIS, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, REAVY WASHINGTON, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, LISA HOOPER, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals and others
Defendant - Respondent: CITY OF SEATTLE, WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and ROGAR MILLAR, Secretary of Transportation for WSDOT, in his official capacity
Amicus Curiae - Pending: DISABILITY RIGHTS WASHINGTON, HOMELESS RIGHTS ADVOCACY PROJECT, NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT and others
USA, et al v. USDC-ORE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-71692
: In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, SHAUN DONOVAN and others
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director o fthe Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Real Party In Interest: KELSEY CASCADIA ROSE JULIANA, XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK and others
City of Laguna Beach v. FAA, et al
as 16-73478
Petitioner: CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
Respondent: FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, MICHAEL P. HUERTA, in his official capacity as Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and others
City of Culver City v. USDOT, et al
as 16-73474
Petitioner: CITY OF CULVER CITY, a chartered municipal corporation
Respondent: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ANTHONY FOXX, Secretary of Transportation, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-35225
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?