Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Jason Nsinano v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-56162
Respondent / Appellee: CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner / Appellant: JASON SINAGWANA NSINANO
Miliam Borjas-Borjas v. William Barr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-16957
Respondent / Appellee: CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, COREY PRICE, in his official capacity as Interim Phoenix Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner / Appellant: MILIAM MARGARITA BORJAS-BORJAS
Jose Guerra v. Nathan Allen, et al
as 20-16943
Petitioner: JOSE EDUARDO GUERRA
Respondent: MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DAVID JENNINGS, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, NATHAN ALLEN, in his official capacity as Warden, Mesa Verde ICE Processing Facility and others
Jose Guerra v. Nathan Allen, et al
as 20-16815
Respondent / Appellee: CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, NATHAN ALLEN, in his official capacity as Warden, Mesa Verde ICE Processing Facility and others
Petitioner / Appellant: JOSE EDUARDO GUERRA
Elsa Ramirez-Herrera v. William Barr, et al
as 20-16777
Petitioner / Appellant: ELSA LETICIA RAMIREZ-HERRERA
Respondent / Appellee: CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, ALBERT R. CARTER, in his official capacity as Phoenix Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
John Doe v. William Barr, et al
as 20-16710
Respondent: TONY H. PHAM, DAVID JENNINGS, in his official capacity as San Francisco Field Office Director of Immigration & Customs Enforcement, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and others
Petitioner: JOHN DOE
Deepak Sahota v. Nathan Allen, et al
as 20-16675
Respondent / Appellee: MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DAVID JENNINGS, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner / Appellant: DEEPAK SAHOTA
Imran Ansari v. Albert Carter, et al
as 20-16652
Respondent / Appellee: CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, ALBERT R. CARTER, Arizona Field Office Director for Enforcement and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Acting Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Petitioner / Appellant: IMRAN HAROON ANSARI, AKA Sheriff Sultan Maknojiya
Yosmel Rodriguez Sanchez v. William Barr, et al
as 20-15606
Respondent / Appellee: KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Senior Official, Performing Duties of the Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, ALBERT R. CARTER, in his official capacity as Phoenix Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Petitioner / Appellant: YOSMEL RODRIGUEZ SANCHEZ, A203-709-164
Ricardo Vasquez Cruz v. William Barr, et al
as 20-15100
Respondent: CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, in his official capacity, WENDELL ANDERSON, in his official capacity as Sheriff-Coroner of Yuba County and others
Petitioner: RICARDO A. VASQUEZ CRUZ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?