Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Sun Ah Kim et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
as 2:2023cv06103
Plaintiff: Sun Ah Kim, Minki Shim and Eunki Shim
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Hee Joon Choi et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2023cv06016
Plaintiff: HEE JOON CHOI, EUN SOOK AN, HANJAE CHOI and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jongkuk Lee v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2023cv05908
Plaintiff: JONGKUK LEE
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mijeong Kang et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2023cv05824
Plaintiff: Mijeong Kang, Sunjae Lee and Woojae Lee
Defendant: United States Cititzenship and Immigration Services, Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jin Hee Lee et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 8:2023cv01257
Plaintiff: Jin Hee Lee, Gina Shin, Jiwon Shin and others
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Yunwoo Chung v- United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2023cv05603
Plaintiff: Yunwoo Chung
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Qing Guo et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv03887
Plaintiff: Qing Guo, Chengkui Yu, Zhenni Yu and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES LOS ANGELES ASYLUM OFFICE and Director of the Unitd States Citizenship and Immigration Services Los Angeles Asylum Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Hongxin Du et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv03428
Plaintiff: HONGXIN DU, XIYUN NI, AINI DU and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES LOS ANGELES ASYLUM OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jingyu Zeng et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2023cv03430
Plaintiff: JINGYU ZENG, HONG ZHANG and CHEN ZHANG
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES LOS ANGELES ASYLUM OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Xiaohua Shi et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2023cv03425
Plaintiff: XIAOHUA SHI, KEXIN HUANG and KEYI HUANG
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?