Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Hayes v. The Entity (IDOC), et al.
as 1:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hayes
Defendant:
The Entity (IDOC), Jay Christensen, Timothy R. McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Jody Carr
Defendant:
John Tewalt, Chad Page, Amanda Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sileoni v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Sileoni
Defendant:
Tewalt, Richerson, Wessels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sileoni v. Richerson, et al.
as 1:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Sileoni
Defendant:
Richerson, Wessels, Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sileoni v. Warden Richardson et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Sileoni
Defendant:
Warden Richardson, Warden Ramirez, Warden Mckay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkinson v. Corizon Medical Services, et al.
as 1:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wilkinson
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services, Warden Blades, Warden Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Carr et al v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2021cv00409
Plaintiff:
Jody Carr and Double Celled Close Custody Inmates of IDOC
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Chad Page, Amanda Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Deputy Warden McKay, et al.
as 1:2021cv00265
Plaintiff:
Jody Carr
Defendant:
Gentry, Christensen and Deputy Warden McKay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2021cv00255
Plaintiff:
John R Lopez
Defendant:
Jay Christensen, Lt. Nicodemus, Timothy McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheltra v. Christensen et al
as 1:2021cv00072
Defendant:
Food Service Supervisor At ISCC,(Macarthur), Jay Christensen and Timothy McKay
Plaintiff:
Shawn Sheltra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
