Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Keyse v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv00126
Plaintiff:
Gerald William Keyse
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
English v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2018cv00123
Plaintiff:
Marcus Girard English
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hirst v. Commissioner, Social Security Admin.
as 1:2018cv00003
Plaintiff:
Tiffany K. Hirst
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Admin.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cook v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2018cv00088
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Cook
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stepanoff v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Sharol Ann Stepanoff
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill and Social Security Administration (SSA)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Belcher v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2016cv00084
Plaintiff:
Brenda Belcher
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Berg v. Tanana Valley Clinic et al
as 4:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
Susan Berg
Defendant:
Tanana Valley Clinic, Alaska Neurology Center, Department of Commerce Community and Economic Development Division of Corporation, Business and Professional Licensing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Whittaker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv00063
Plaintiff:
Susan Christine Whittaker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Weaver v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv00034
Plaintiff:
Angela Gay Weaver
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hollering v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2014cv00251
Plaintiff:
Angelica Rose Hollering
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
