Cases 41 - 50 of 53,918
Watkins v. Bean et al
as 2:2024cv01100
Petitioner:
Keenan Watkins
Respondent:
Jeremy Bean and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crawley v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2024cv00252
Petitioner:
Daine Anton Crawley
Respondent:
Breitenbach and Attorney General State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Janvier, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3685
Petitioner:
FRANTZCY JANVIER, LOUISINA SAINT-JUSTE and ENZO JANVIER
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Juan-Esteban v. Garland
as 24-3690
Petitioner:
MARCOS JUAN-ESTEBAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Fresenius Medical Care Orange County, LLC, et al. v. Bonta, et al.
as 24-3654
Plaintiff:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE ORANGE COUNTY, LLC, JANE DOE, DA VITA, INC. and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of California, RICARDO LARA, in his Official Capacity as California Insurance Commissioner, MARY WATANABE, in her Official Capacity as Director of the California Department of Managed Health Care and others
Castillo-Aguilar v. Garland
as 24-3657
Petitioner:
ENRIQUE LEONEL CASTILLO-AGUILAR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sanchez Morales v. Garland
as 24-3666
Petitioner:
VICTORINO SANCHEZ MORALES, I
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gilbert v. Henley et al
as 3:2024cv00245
Petitioner:
Jesse Calvin Gilbert
Respondent:
Henley and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Breitenbach, et al.
as 24-3671
Petitioner:
MARLON LORENZO BROWN
Respondent:
N. BREITENBACH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Martin-Perez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3669
Petitioner:
DULCE VERONICA MARTIN-PEREZ and ZOE YAMILET MARTIN-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
