Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 315
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01797
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Perez-Quinilla, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1919
Petitioner: LUIS YAERSINIO PEREZ-QUINILLA, LUIS DANIEL PEREZ-CUEVAS, LILI LUCRESIA CUEVAS-RODRIGUEZ DE PEREZ and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02228
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02435
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lily Daneshgar et al v. State Farm General Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv01980
Plaintiff: LILY DANESHGAR and SHAHRAM DANESHGAR
Defendant: STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01128
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Ko v. Thurman
as 4:2022cv09087
Plaintiff: Lily Helen Ko
Defendant: Christine Angela Thurman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re Lily Helen Ko We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022mc80340
HP Inc. et al v. WISETA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00344
Defendant: WISETA, ZHAICOLOR, MOOHO and others
Plaintiff: HP Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
USA v. Lili Tydingco
as 23-10016
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: LILI ZHANG TYDINGCO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?