Cases 51 - 60 of 132
Ameris Bank v. Peter F. DiPaolo et al
as 8:2024cv00934
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
MD, PA Peter F. DiPaolo and Peter F. DiPaolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. Quality Towing Service LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Quality Towing Service LLC and Omar Ahmed Saddon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. Southern Coker Power L.L.C. et al
as 8:2024cv00921
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Southern Coker Power L.L.C. and Ethridge Cody Coker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank V. Katia Soler
as 8:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation, Katia Soler and Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. MTA Transport LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00877
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
MTA Transport, LLC and Mustafa Osman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Ameris Bank v. Ruby Transport Inc et al
as 8:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation doing business as Vendor Services Center and Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation doing business as Vendor Services Center
Defendant:
Ruby Transport Inc, Leila Cantu and Ricardo Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. E Z Portable Buildings, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank a Georgia statechartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
E Z Portable Buildings, Inc. and Trendon Burnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. L and M Tree Company LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation Ameris Bank, Georgia state chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital and Ameris Bank a Georgia statechartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital
Defendant:
L&M Tree Company LLC, Matthew Heffelfinger and L and M Tree Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. T&M Transport LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
T&M Transport LLC, Martha Jo Gardner and Timothy Gardner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. Everlast Investments Group LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Everlast Investments Group LLC and Cortez Derek Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
