Cases 51 - 60 of 2,212
Smith v. Howell, et al.
as 24-857
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER O. SMITH
Respondent:
JERRY HOWELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and RONALD OLIVER, Substituted per [92] Order for Jerry Howell
Coleman v. Najera et al
as 2:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Demarene Coleman
Respondent:
Warden Najera and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edmiston v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-786
Petitioner:
JUSTIN EDMISTON
Respondent:
WILLIAM GITTERE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Rodriguez v. Hardy et al
as 3:2023cv00660
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Rodriguez
Respondent:
David A. Hardy and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King-Hardiman v. Breitenbach, et al.
as 24-598
Petitioner:
ANDRE KING-HARDIMAN
Respondent:
NETHANJAH BREITENBACH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Marquez v. Frazier, et al.
as 24-578
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHNNY A. MARQUEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
FERNANDIES FRAZIER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Respondent:
RENEE BAKER and TIM GARRETT
Guzman v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-587
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARCO GUZMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM GITTERE, CHARLES DANIELS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Respondent:
CALVIN JOHNSON and STATE OF NEVADA
McNeal v. Oliver, et al.
as 24-474
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARCUS SHARIF MCNEAL
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD OLIVER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Houston v. Johnson, et al.
as 24-397
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Lampkin
as 2:2023cv01997
Petitioner:
Devin Lampkin
Respondent:
High Desert State Prison and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
