Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 353
Mullaney v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07745
Plaintiff: Justin Mullaney
Defendant: Juul Labs, Inc. doing business as previously d/b/a as Pax Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Smith v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07762
Plaintiff: Jeremy Smith
Defendant: Juul Labs, Inc. agent of Juul Labs, Inc., previously d/b/a as Pax Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Samuels v. Juul Labs Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07775
Plaintiff: Ramon Samuels
Defendant: Juul Labs Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Almeida v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07766
Plaintiff: Olivia Almeida
Defendant: Juul Labs, Inc. doing business as previously d/b/a as Pax Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Reid v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07767
Plaintiff: Riley Reid
Defendant: Juul Labs, Inc. agent of previously d/b/a as Pax Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. Juul Labs, Inc., previously d/b/a as Pax Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07729
Plaintiff: Garner Vail Brown
Defendant: Juul Labs, Inc., previously d/b/a as Pax Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Foster v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07605
Plaintiff: Nicholas T. Foster
Defendant: Juul Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as Pax Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as Ploom, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Yahya v. JUUL Labs, Inc., et al
as 3:2022cv07503
Plaintiff: Taha Yahya
Defendant: JUUL Labs, Inc. doing business as PAX Labs, Inc. doing business as Ploom Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
City and County of San Francisco, et al v. BP PLC, et al
as 22-16812
Plaintiff / Appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a Municipal Corporation and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the San Francisco City Attorney
Defendant / Appellant: BP PLC, a public limited company of England and Wales, CHEVRON CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, a Delaware corporation and others
City of Oakland, et al v. BP PLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-16810
Plaintiff / Appellee: CITY OF OAKLAND, a Municipal Corporation and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through the City Attorney for the City of Oakland
Defendant / Appellant: BP PLC, a public limited company of England and Wales, CHEVRON CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, a Delaware corporation and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?