Cases 51 - 60 of 215
WildEarth Guardians v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 21-56316
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS
Defendant / Appellant:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, in her official capacity as U.S. Secretary of the Interior and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
WildEarth Guardians et al v. USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife Services et al
as 3:2021cv00508
Plaintiff:
Julie Cavanaugh-Bill, Jennifer Schwartz, Talasi Brooks and others
Defendant:
United States Attorney District of Nevada, United States Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 4321
Idaho State Snowmobile Assoc. v. USFS, et al
as 21-35990
Plaintiff / Appellee:
IDAHO STATE SNOWMOBILE ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, SAWTOOTH NATIONAL FOREST, FOREST SUPERVISOR JIM DEMAAGD, in his capacity as Acting Forest Supervisor for the Sawtooth National Forest and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
WINTER WILDLANDS ALLIANCE and WILDEARTH GUARDIANS
Idaho State Snowmobile Assoc. v. USFS, et al
as 21-35955
Plaintiff / Appellee:
IDAHO STATE SNOWMOBILE ASSOCIATION
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, SAWTOOTH NATIONAL FOREST, FOREST SUPERVISOR JIM DEMAAGD, in his capacity as Acting Forest Supervisor for the Sawtooth National Forest and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
WINTER WILDLANDS ALLIANCE and WILDEARTH GUARDIANS
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. USFS, et al
as 21-35936
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and KETTLE RANGE CONSERVATION GROUP
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, GLENN CASAMASSA, Pacific Northwest Regional Forester and RODNEY SMOLDON, Forest Supervisor
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
DIAMOND M RANCH, a Washington General Partnership
Crow Indian Tribe, et al v. USA, et al
as 21-35811
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CROW INDIAN TRIBE, CROW CREEK SIOUX TRIBE, STANDING ROCK SIOUX TRIBE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and others
NEDC, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 21-35918
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and NATIVE FISH SOCIETY
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF SALEM and COUNTY OF MARION
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. American Farm Bureau Federatio, et al
as 21-16383
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, CASCADIA WILDLANDS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, MARTHA WILLIAMS, Director United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL and STATE OF UTAH
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN SHEEP INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION and others
Petitioner:
AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, SPORTSMENS ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATION and others
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. U.S. Sheep Experiment Station, et al
as 21-35527
Defendant:
U.S. SHEEP EXPERIMENT STATION and USDA AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN SHEEP INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. U.S. Sheep Experiment Station, et al
as 21-35460
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN SHEEP INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellant:
USDA AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE and U.S. SHEEP EXPERIMENT STATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
