Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Harel Pia Mutual Fund v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv06871
Defendant:
Christopher Ballinger, George E. Borst, Robert S. Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Harel Pia Mutual Fund
Toyota Motor Credit Corporation v. Fortune
as 3:2010cv04024
Plaintiff:
Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Defendant:
Julia Fortune
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Toyota Motor Credit Corporation v. Fortune
as 4:2010cv04024
Plaintiff:
Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Defendant:
Julia Fortune
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Deisy F Toledo v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 8:2010cv00737
Plaintiff:
DEISY F TOLEDO
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. and others
Rosalina Diaz v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 8:2010cv00738
Plaintiff:
Melanie Berlieb, Rosalina Diaz, Elvira Gesell and others
Defendant:
CTS Corporation, John Does, Toyota Motor Corporation and others
Joel Grunkemeyer et al v. Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc. et al
as 8:2010cv00608
Plaintiff:
Joel Grunkemeyer, John Sukola and Sharon Wilson
Defendant:
Joseph Toyota of Cincinnati, Kings Toyota, Inc., Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and others
Harel Pia Mutual Fund v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv02578
Defendant:
George E. Borst, Robert S. Carter, Fujio Cho and others
Movant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Pension Reserves Investment Management Board
Plaintiff:
Harel Pia Mutual Fund
Zapata v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv01638
Plaintiff:
Francis Zapata
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and Law Offices of Patenaude & Felix A.P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Molnar v. SRA Associates Inc et al
as 3:2007cv01087
Plaintiff:
Alfred Molnar
Defendant:
SRA Associates Inc, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and Patenaude & Felix APC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
