Cases 71 - 80 of 132
Ameris Banket et al v. Okamura Investments Inc et al
as 8:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Okamura Investments Inc and Jimmy Arias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. Ganesh Hospitality LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital
Defendant:
Ganesh Hospitality LLC an Indiana Limited Liability Company doing business as Days Inn and Konilkumar Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. Texas Towing and Hauling LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Texas Towing and Hauling LLC and Christopher Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. ESCP Corp.
as 8:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
ESCP Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. Montante Plastic Surgery & Aesthetics LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Montante Plastic Surgery & Aesthetics LLC, Steven Montante and Shelly Montante
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. Miljanovic Trucking Inc.
as 8:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Miljanovic Trucking, INC. and Miljanovic Trucking Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. Prompt USA, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv02494
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Prompt USA, INC. and Constantin Tenea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. Major Movez Transport LLC et al
as 8:2023cv02480
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation Ameris Bank a Georgia state chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state-charterd banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Major Movez Transport LLC and Michael Fields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. Jerry Harvey Audio LLC et al
as 8:2023cv02483
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Jerry Harvey Audio LLC and Jerry Harvey Junior, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. ENT Allergy and Sinus Center, Inc.
as 8:2023cv02484
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation Ameris Bank a Georgia state chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
ENT Allergy & Sinus Center Inc ENT Allergy & Sinus Center Inc an Ohio corporation doing business as Fine Arts Skin & Laser and ENT Allergy and Sinus Center, Inc. an Ohio corporation doing business as Fine Arts Skin and Laser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
