Cases 71 - 79 of 79
Desire LLC v. Exist Inc et al
as 2:2012cv06650
Plaintiff:
Desire LLC
Defendant:
Exist Inc, Lany Group LLC, Rainbow USA Inc and others
Star Fabrics Inc v. Rainbow USA Inc et al
as 2:2012cv03731
Defendant:
Amber Inc, Does, Exist Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Star Fabrics Inc
Guru Denim Inc v. Rainbow USA Inc et al
as 2:2012cv01591
Defendant:
Does and Rainbow USA Inc
Plaintiff:
Guru Denim Inc
Star Fabrics Inc v. Rainbow USA Inc et al
as 2:2011cv06733
Defendant:
Does, Rainbow USA Inc and Skiva International Inc
Plaintiff:
Star Fabrics Inc
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Simon International Trading Corp. et al
as 2:2010cv04471
Defendant:
Citi Trends Inc., Does, Fashion Surplus Importers, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc.
LA Printex Industries Inc v. Rite Aid Corp et al
as 2:2010cv04416
Defendant:
AJI Ltd, Big M Inc, Catherine Stores Corp and others
Plaintiff:
LA Printex Industries Inc
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Skiva International, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv05728
Plaintiff:
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. and L.A. Printex Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Skiva International, Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Rainbow USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Mangel Stores Corp. et al
as 2:2009cv04438
Plaintiff:
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. and L.A. Printex Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Mangel Stores Corp., Concepts By Malcom, Inc., Ross Stores, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Type:
Intellectual Property
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Rainbow USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv06232
Plaintiff:
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. and L.A. Printex Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Rainbow USA, Inc., POMC LLC, Simon International and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
